Monday, June 27, 2011

Why Aren't You Speaking English

I've been meaning to post about this, and I will, I swear.

While I'm writing down my thoughts, mull it.


Update: Apparently, having No God threatens a church in Ohio. A not-so-undisputed list (see Comments) of failed states, courtesy of Foreign Policy.

More to come in my Evening Update of this post...

Franco Moretti

Franco Moretti says if you stand back you can Understand Literature, a stance summed up in this NY TIMES Article.

My comments are the following:

I have two objections to Moretti: 1) Perhaps if you seek to understand literature that's what you might do: pull out a chart and stand back from it all, seeking to get an aerial view. But seriously, who reads thinking that by finishing a few books we'll understand all of literature. (And don't readers read to understand reading, not literature?) And 2) what's all this bullshit about "sample size"? Literature isn't a fucking survey! If we believe that literature is comprised of words and deeds, then each book is filled with thousands of each, making reading even two books a pretty fruitful undertaking.

I don't purport to know why everyone reads, but it seems silly and naive to supplant the premise that by reading a few books one would ever "understand" anything with "Don't read books and you'll understand all of literature."

Agreed. His mapping techniques are interesting, and would be amazing to use in class (assuming everyone had read/was reading the text in question), but without reading over the language each author uses, claims to understanding seem -- like Plot on his charts -- thin.